Financial History 134 (Summer 2020) | Page 20

Collection of the Museum of American Finance Checks for the enlargement of the Erie Canal, dated July 26, 1842 and September 14, 1849. The Erie Canal was a prime example of the mixed financing model that combined investor dollars and public monies. of infrastructure construction. They used a mixture of investor dollars and public monies to fund many projects, with the 365-mile Erie Canal being a prime example of this mixed financing model. By the end of Madison’s presidency, half a dozen companies were operating primitive versions of short-line railroads, and they were doing so without any federal funding. From 1825–29, President John Quincy Adams enthusiastically embraced the federal role in the development of internal improvements. This President approved congressional appropriations for many projects. He also authorized the purchase of stock in several canal companies and the distribution of more federal land grants to companies building turnpikes and canals. Even with these clear signs of presidential support, Congress remained unwilling to develop a plan for an integrated system of national transportation improvements or to pass a constitutional amendment addressing the federal role in financing such a program. At the time, only the most insightful seemed to appreciate an ominous change in the attitude of many congressmen as they contemplated internal improvements. Lawmakers had always acted based on their own local and partisan concerns. In the 19th and 20th congresses, however, their votes began reflecting the growing differences between East and West, as well as North and South. Southern legislators in particular began demonstrating their concern that a federal government empowered to interfere in one aspect of their states’ prerogatives would be tempted to exercise its influence over others, including the maintenance of their “peculiar institution.” All the same, growing public demands insured that the construction of all types of internal improvements continued apace. During Adams’ one term in office, federal spending on those projects exceeded $3.8 million. In his 1829 inaugural address, President Andrew Jackson called for a less intrusive and less active federal government. Jackson no had objection to using federal funds for river and harbor improvements, such as breakwaters and piers, and for related aids to navigation such as lighthouses. The Constitution did indeed permit spending on such projects in the furtherance of national defense. The President also supported the establishment of improved transportation networks throughout the incorporated territories in the West and the South. While he acknowledged the federal government’s role in that work, he insisted that the individual states, not the federal government, were responsible for such projects within the Union’s formal boundaries. In May 1830, Jackson demonstrated his opposition to direct federal involvement in internal improvements within the states by vetoing a federal investment in the company building the Maysville Road turnpike in Kentucky. He also suggested the sale of all existing ownership interests in such projects. The President did sign a bill extending the Cumberland Road, but he relinquished federal authority over that road by transferring the responsibility for future improvements to the several states through which it ran. During his eight years in office, President Jackson supported more than $14 million worth of internal improvements, mostly throughout the territories. In his March 1837 farewell address, the President took credit for ending the federal government’s role in financing internal improvements in the states. More accurately, he put a stop to the on-again-off-again efforts to establish an integrated, federally financed system of transportation links throughout the Union. Despite President Jackson’s actions, internal improvements remained very popular across the nation. Many states amended their constitutions to provide financial support for roads, canals and railroads, even if doing so meant incurring more debt. Collectively, the states that had issued about $25 million worth of bonds during the 1820s floated more than $40 million worth in the first half of the 1830s, and almost $108 million more from 1835- 37. Some $109 million of their combined total debt of $172 million at the end of 1838 had been earmarked for turnpikes, canals and railroads. The Panic of 1837 had a devastating impact on the construction of internal improvements. During the presidency of Martin Van Buren (1837–41), federal spending in that area fell to $7.5 million, much of which involved improvements to rivers and harbors. Many states defaulted on their debts; others amended their constitutions to prohibit spending 18 FINANCIAL HISTORY | Summer 2020 | www.MoAF.org