Financial History 134 (Summer 2020) | Page 36

Buying was fueled by growing confidence in Law’s abilities; by the Regent’s and Law’s substantial purchases; by allowing purchase on credit; and above all, by the desire of those who held billets d’état to unload them. Billets were discounted 60 to 70% on the market—investors could buy a 500 mère for a third of that value in billets, and if Law ran the Company as well as his bank, dividends on shares would far outweigh interest on billets. Treasury delays in issuing billets d’état hindered purchases, and not until December 1718 was full capitalization achieved. In spite of this, the Company forged ahead with its plans for Louisiana, possibly using Law’s personal funds. Already in September 1717 it had sold land concessions, some near a place it dubbed “New Orleans.” Mobile and Biloxi had been stop-gaps for guarding the Mississippi, but exploiting the river’s trade required a port on the river. During the lean years, only commandant (later governor) Jean-Baptiste Le Moyne de Bienville’s genius at Indian relations had kept the colony alive. Now he chose an ancient Native trading site near the Gulf, easy to defend and a short portage to the lake (Pontchartrain). By May 1718, Bienville’s men were clearing land and building huts on what would become the French Quarter. A simple beginning, but one 20 years in the making, and only happening at all thanks to the existence of Law’s Company—which in its first 16 months alone brought more ships to Louisiana than Crozat’s had in nearly six years. January 1719 saw the next step in Law’s System: the Banque Générale became the Banque Royale, answerable only to the Regent. In June, with Company share prices lagging, Law engineered a merger with the companies of the Indies, of China and of Africa. However, as these were all in debt, Law raised 75 million by issuing a second and third round of shares in June and July for his consolidated Compagnie des Indes: the filles (daughters) and petites-filles (granddaughters) were payable in currency (not billets) and could only be bought (or re-sold) by holders of mères. Over the next six months, as the price of mères rose to over 50 times their original cost, those most heavily invested in them—including Law, the Regent and their backers at court—saw their wealth increase spectacularly, and the term “millionaire” was coined to describe these Mississippians. When the Company issued further rounds of shares in the fall, buying grew to a frenzy. Law, to ensure adequate liquidity, had since January let the Banque Royale issue several billion livres in new bank notes. Some of this issuance was hidden from Parlement by the Regent, and some from the Regent by Law, whose self-confident gambler’s nature was showing. Literally wagering on his System, he made “side-bets” worth millions of livres with British counterparts—which he would lose—that his “Mississippi Company” would outperform the East India Company—which it did not. To prop up the System, Law had flooded France with far more paper currency than the real economy could handle, and inflation was becoming rampant. But for the moment, seeing only bulls in the market, Law offered in August 1719 to take over the entire national debt in return for control of the tax-farms—depriving the tax-farming nobility of their income, as they had feared. A decree on December 1, 1719 replaced most specie with bank notes; the next day Company shares peaked at 10,025 , but then began a slow decline—some big investors had begun cashing out. On December 30, a Company office was opened in Paris to trade shares at prices fixed by the Banque Royale, steadying the market. On Banque Royale de France, 100-livre note, August 1719. January 5, 1720, Law was named Controller-General of Finances, in effect prime minister of France; three days later shares peaked again, at 10,100 . But rumors of disease, famine and failed concessions in Louisiana were reaching Paris; when the Company trading-office closed in February share prices fell again, losing almost 20% in one week. With investors fuming, Law again tried to put on the brakes: a decree of March 5 re-opened the share-trading office, guaranteeing to buy at 9,000 . But over the previous months the public had seen, in an attempt to bolster the System, so many decrees and counter-decrees micromanaging monetary policy—gold and silver were in, gold and silver were out—it seemed a return to Louis XIV’s feckless economy, and Law’s guarantee was not trusted. Investors had lost confidence, and the frantic share sell-offs and bank note cashing that ensued led to panic and violence in the streets of Paris, which had a deep psychological impact on the Regency. Law’s many enemies at court— the tax-farmers, financiers and others— used the emerging cracks in his System (which they themselves intentionally exacerbated) to convince the Regent it could not be sustained. The remainder of 1720 saw a steady decline in Company share prices and in The Historic New Orleans Collection, 2001-47-L 34 FINANCIAL HISTORY | Summer 2020 | www.MoAF.org