Financial History Issue 117 (Spring 2016) | Page 22
Dear Chairman
Boardroom Battles and
the Rise of Shareholder Activism
By Jeff Gramm
Public companies are filled with contradiction and conflict of interest. The best
place to study these peculiar institutions
is at the fault line where shareholders
and corporate managers and directors
meet. I’ve always kept a collection of “Dear
Chairman” letters on my desk. To me, each
one is a fascinating example of capitalism
at work; the critical point at which a shareholder decides to engage management, distilled into a letter. The business world can
be a messy place, and there is perhaps
no better way to understand it than to
study its many conflicts. These letters teach
us how American business really works,
through the voices of its most interesting
participants.
Robert R. Young and the Proxyteers
The proxy fight for the C&O Railway sent
a warning shot through public company
boardrooms across the country. Robert
R. Young, whom the Saturday Evening
Post would later call “The Daring Young
Man of Wall Street,” bested Guaranty
Trust and, allegedly, J.P. Morgan, not with
ample supplies of capital, but merely by
lobbying public shareholders.
He also caught the attention of a handful of aggressive young men who were
beginning to build their own business
empires during the Great Depression.
Young’s campaign for the C&O Railway
taught them a winning strategy for seeking control of public companies by proxy
vote. When the US economy began to
20 FINANCIAL HISTORY | Spring 2016 | www.MoAF.org
expand after the end of World War II,
they worked from Young’s playbook to
target underperforming public companies, including major railroads and other
household names such as Montgomery
Ward, Decca Records, 20th Century–Fox
and MGM-Loews. This group of feared
raiders picked up a name in 1951, when
the management of United Cigar–Whelan
Stores Corporation labeled Charles Green
a “Proxyteer.”
The 1950s were bountiful for investors.
The decade remains one of the Dow Jones
Industrial Average’s best ever, with a 240%
gain. The ’50s also saw significant changes
in the ownership structures of public
companies. Wall Street vigorously promoted broad share ownership with efforts
such as the New York Stock Exchange’s