Financial History Issue 115 (Fall 2015) | Page 12

EDUCATORS’ PERSPECTIVE How Hen Fever Led to the Chicken of Tomorrow (Part 2: The Chicken of Tomorrow Contest and the Development of the US Poultry Industry) It was Howard C. Pierce’s idea. In 1944, Pierce, the poultry research director for A&P Food Stores, addressed a group of Canadian poultry producers who had expressed great concern that the poultry business would face catastrophic decline when the war ended and beef and pork were no longer rationed. Pierce challenged them to breed a meatier chicken, and his comments at that meeting eventually led to A&P’s sponsorship of a long-range program to develop such a chicken, which A&P publicists dubbed “The Chicken of Tomorrow Contest.” Historian Margaret E. Derry called this contest “the most important event in the 20th century for the poultry-meat-breeding industry.” The poultry industry had come a long way since Hen Fever raged in the early 19th century. A burgeoning broiler industry, which began in the 1920s, was supplying major metropolitan areas such as New York City with chicken, but for most Americans, chicken was only served on Sundays, holidays or special occasions. Beef and pork were what most Americans thought of as meat; chicken was considered a meat substitute. Meat rationing during World War II increased the consumption of chicken on the home front when, according to nutritional historian Amy Bentley, “…up to 60% of ‘US Choice’ grade cuts of beef, was reserved for military consumption.” A World War II manual entitled How to Stow and Take Care of Food on Shipboard reminded sailors to take especially good care of meat: Mainstay of many a well-balanced meal, meat is one of the major providers of life-essential complete proteins needed to repair body tissue as it wears out, and to furnish the building blocks for new muscle and sinew in husky, hardy men who follow the sea. But meat is more than that. It is the provider of those savory aromas that awaken the appetite — the part of a meal that makes a man finish feeling well-fed. Meat “sticks to the ribs.” Courtesy of North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina. By Brian Grinder and Dan Cooper Wax model of an “ideal” chicken from the Chicken of Tomorrow Contest. Without meat, according to myriads of government pamphlets, the war effort would be placed in serious jeopardy. Civilians were encouraged to eat chicken and organ meats instead of beef and pork. Thus, chicken sales increased during the war, but once the war ended, chicken producers were justifiably concerned that meat-hungry Americans would abandon chicken and embrace the return of beef and pork to the dining room table. While there were a number of factors that kept chicken from competing effectively with beef and pork, the most important factor was price. In 1950, chicken cost more than hamburger. Furthermore, the average size of a chicken was about three pounds, which was too large for two people to consume but too small for a large family. A larger, less expensive bird along with more choices of cuts and 10    FINANCIAL HISTORY  |  Fall 2015  | www.MoAF.org products was needed before chicken could ever hope to conquer the meat industry. Historian Glenn Bugos wrote that “Doc” Pierce hoped to, in the words of a 1947 Saturday Evening Post article, “squelch that dream of two chickens in every pot by providing one bird chunky enough for the whole family.’” That same article noted that the goal of the Chicken of Tomorrow Contest was to provide Americans “a chicken with breast meat so thick you can carve it into steaks, with drumsticks that contain a minimum of bone buried in layers of juicy dark meat, all costing less instead of more.” The contest offered a prize of $5,000 to the entrant that came closest to producing a chicken that most closely resembled a wax model that was considered to be the ideal bird by the contest committee. The contest ran in a three-year cycle with state contests held the first year, regional contests held the second year and a national contest held the third year. The cycle was repeated twice with the first cycle ending with the national contest in 1948 and the second cycle ending in 1951. The 1948 national contest was held in Georgetown, Delaware, with 40 contestants who were selected based on the state and regional results of the previous two years. Each contestant sent 720 eggs to Delaware, where they were hatched and reared for 12 weeks under identical conditions. At the end of the 12 weeks, the birds were weighed and sent to be slaughtered. 50 carcasses were selected at random from each contestant and judged on the basis of feed conversion, average weight, rate of feathering and uniformity of stock. A similar process was used in the 1951 national contest, which was held in Fayetteville, Arkansas. The Vantress Poultry Breeding Farm of Live Oak, California won both national contests. The winning birds were CornishNew Hampshire crosses; a bird with blood